Borradores de Economía - Health Promoting Companies in Colombia: Health risk management, technical efficiency, and financial strength

Keep in mind

The series Working Papers on Economics is published by the Office for Economic Studies at the Banco de la República (Central Bank of Colombia). The works published are provisional, and their authors are fully responsible for the opinions expressed in them, as well as for possible mistakes. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Banco de la República or its Board of Directors.

AUTHOR OR EDITOR
Melo-Becerra, Ligia Alba
Vásquez-Escobar, Diego
Alarcón-Obando, María Isabel
Silva-Samudio, Giselle Tatiana

The series Borradores de Economía (Working Papers on Economics) contributes to the dissemination and promotion of the work by researchers from the institution. On multiple occasions, these works have been the result of collaborative work with individuals from other national or international institutions. This series is indexed at Research Papers in Economics (RePEc). The opinions contained in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not commit Banco de la República or its Board of Directors.

Publication Date:
Friday, 21 June 2024

Abstract

This document describes the Colombian healthcare system and its main responsibilities, highlighting the roles of insurance and financing, and compares it with other healthcare systems globally. Additionally, using stochastic frontier techniques, it estimates the efficiency in the use of resources of the Health Promoting Entities (EPS) in Colombia, during the period 2014 to 2021. The results indicate that the average efficiency is 58%, with significant dispersion, suggesting that EPS in the country have operated at very different levels of efficiency in the administration and management of their resources, ranging from a minimum of 1% to a maximum of 92%. A scale efficiency measure is also estimated to determine the extent to which entities optimize the size of their operations, finding that 41.9% of the most efficient EPS have the best gains in scale efficiency, while 46.2% of the least efficient ones have the worst results. Finally, using the CAMEL methodology, a financial and managerial strength analysis of these entities is conducted. The results reveal a high correlation between the efficiency estimates of the EPS and the indicators of relative market size and portfolio quality, emphasizing the importance of scale efficiency in the performance of EPS.