Fiscal effects of the minimum wage in Colombia
The series Working Papers on Economics is published by the Office for Economic Studies at the Banco de la República (Central Bank of Colombia). The works published are provisional, and their authors are fully responsible for the opinions expressed in them, as well as for possible mistakes. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Banco de la República or its Board of Directors.
The series Borradores de Economía (Working Papers on Economics) contributes to the dissemination and promotion of the work by researchers from the institution. On multiple occasions, these works have been the result of collaborative work with individuals from other national or international institutions. This series is indexed at Research Papers in Economics (RePEc). The opinions contained in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not commit Banco de la República or its Board of Directors.
Abstract
Using a computable general equilibrium model calibrated for 2019, shocks of various characteristics to the minimum wage are simulated to establish the effects on the nation's fiscal accounts. This document is a pioneer in that analysis. The evidence suggests adverse effects of increases in the minimum wage above past inflation and the change in productivity. An increase of these characteristics by 1% takes the General Government deficit in 2022 from 5.6% of GDP to 5.7%. If the simulated increase is 3.25%, as occurred for 2022, it takes the deficit from 5.6% to 5.8% of GDP and increases the total deficit of the Central National Government (CNG) and the debt by 0.13 percentage points (pp) and 0 .29pp, respectively. The semi-elasticity of the fiscal deficit of the CNG to the minimum wage is 0.04 while the elasticity of GDP to the minimum wage is –0.17. When the simulation scenario goes up to 2030, the deterioration of public finances is greater. Depending on the magnitude and persistence of the increases in the minimum wage, in that year, the GDP growth rate can fall to 39 basic points (bp). Similarly, important deteriorations are observed in the total deficit and the debt of the CNG and in the trajectories of expenditure in both pensions and health. In 2030 the deficit goes from: 2.79% to 3.52% of GDP and the public debt increases by more than 400 bp, while health and pension expenses increase by more than 20 bp each. In all cases there is job destruction and an increase in labor informality.
